US prosecutors say Uber missed criminal drivers
SAN FRANCISCO, United States — Prosecutors from California have accused global ridesharing service Uber of misleading customers and having lax background checks that let criminals drive for the firm, court documents show.
Prosecutors in San Francisco and Los Angeles claim they found 25 people with serious criminal histories driving for Uber in the state, including a murderer, a sex offender and an identity thief.
The company’s background checking process was riddled with “systemic failures,” they alleged.
“In Los Angeles alone, registered sex offenders, a kidnapper, identity thieves, burglars, and a convicted murderer had passed Uber’s ‘industry leading’ background check,” the prosecutors wrote in a complaint that seeks penalties against the company.
The drivers’ criminal histories only came to light after they were caught in other infractions while driving for Uber, the documents allege.
The company’s publicity, it said, was “likely to mislead consumers into believing that Uber does everything it can to ensure their safety and that Uber’s background check process will capture all of the criminal history of an applicant,” the complaint said.
It said the allegedly “misleading representations” were particularly dangerous given that many California parents send their teenage children unaccompanied with Uber drivers.
Uber treats its drivers as independent contractors, and has generally fewer contract obligations surrounding them then typical cab companies.
Uber responded by saying it disagreed with the conclusion that state prosecutors had come to.
“While we agree with the district attorneys that safety is a priority, we disagree that the Livescan process used by taxi companies is an inherently better system for screening drivers than our background checks,” a company statement said.
Uber said it was looking forward “to resolving this issue” noting that the case was similar to one settled last year by rival ridesharing company Lyft.
Uber, which recently reached a valuation of $50 billion, has been criticized, boycotted and faced legal action around the world because of its cost-cutting business model.
Some drivers in California have charged that they should be treated as employees of the company and receive benefits, not entitled to independent contractors.
A British union said last month it would take legal action over pay and conditions for drivers.
You may be interested
Slothy Sunday: Restrictions are lifted, now what? See sloths, what else!Mariana Diaz / Toucan Rescue Ranch - March 7, 2021
This is officially the first week we are all allowed to drive again on both days of the weekend, how…
Sloths in Costa Rica: 11 Little Known FactsThe Tico Times - March 7, 2021
Since they were first described by naturalists in the 1700s, sloths have been misunderstood. Early scientists described the slow-moving beasts…
Surge in young migrant border arrivals poses challenge for United StatesLaura BONILLA / AFP - March 6, 2021
Thousands of minors without papers are arriving at the US border with Mexico, presenting President Joe Biden with a potentially…