• Costa Rica Travel Insurance
  • Costa Rica Coffee Guide

High Court Rules on Shark Finning Case

February 17, 2006

Environmentalists have won 80% of the battle to protect the sharks in Costa Rican waters with two recent government resolutions, Randall Arauz, president of the Marine Turtle Restoration Program (PRETOMA) told The Tico Times this week.

Still, they won’t be satisfied until the battle is completely won, he added.

The Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court (Sala IV) on Feb. 3 ruled in favor of sharks in a lawsuit filed by PRETOMA last year against the Costa Rican Fisheries Institute (INCOPESCA), the General Customs Administration and the Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MOPT).

In the suit, filed Feb. 19, 2004, PRETOMA complained that the state was allowing fishing vessels to unload shark fins on private docks without inspectors present.

The Sala IV agreed with environmentalists that the government agencies have failed to fulfill their duties to protect the marine ecosystem. Environmentalists say that shark finning, the removal of sharks’ cartilagefilled fins from their lower-valued bodies which are then discarded, is severely depleting Costa Rica’s shark populations.

The high court ordered Customs and INCOPESCA to immediately prohibit all vessels possibly dedicated to shark fishing from unloading on private docks unless government representatives are present, including an official from the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE), Arauz told The Tico Times.

The ruling resembles one issued in 2004, when the high court held Customs responsible for violating the Constitution by allowing fins to be unloaded at private docks without inspectors present (TT, June 18, 2004).

INCOPESCA general technical director Marvin Mora this week said unloading at private docks continues in the Pacific province of Puntarenas, where two public docks – Caldera, just south of the port town of Puntarenas, and Cruceros, the cruise-ship dock in Puntarenas – lack the infrastructure to unload seafood items.

However, he said the institute has participated in 2,345 inspections at public and private docks in the past four years, of which approximately 650 were foreign vessels.

Mora said that INCOPESCA, of all the institutions involved (in the PRETOMA lawsuit) has performed its inspection duties and will continue to do so.

Customs General Manager José Alberto Martínez told The Tico Times that Customs will comply with the court ruling in the interest of improving its performance.

The Government Attorney’s Office issued a statement Jan 25. against INCOPESCA’s interpretation of the country’s Fishing Law – for the second time in the past eight months.

The Fishing Law, passed in February 2004, punishes shark finning with prison and fines (TT, Feb. 18, 2004) and stipulates that shark fishing is allowed only when sharks are “unloaded at docks with their respective fins attached to the body.”

Environmentalists and some INCOPESCA officials admit the institute interpreted this to mean the fins can be attached artificially to the bodies, using nylon string and ropes, though other officials deny this.

Although the Government Attorney’s Office said the fins must be adhered naturally in a resolution last year (TT, Dec. 23, 2005), INCOPESCA press officer Hugo Solano admitted they continued allowing them to be attached artificially after they found support from a group of legislators (TT, Jan. 20).

Patriotic Bloc legislator Rafael Varela, with the support of approximately 20 legislators and the INCOPESCA board of directors, asked the Government Attorney’s Office to reconsider its pronouncement last year.

Last month, the Attorney’s Office rejected their request, establishing that fins must be attached naturally to be legal. However, Jorge López, INCOPESCA chief of the protection and registry department located next to the INCOPESCA dock in Puntarenas, told The Tico Times that after the Fishing Law took effect in April 2005 and until now, the institute has allowed only sharks with naturally adhered fins to be unloaded.

“In this story, only one side (the environmentalists’) has been heard,” he said.

Arauz, meanwhile, said environmentalists will be satisfied only after fishing vessels are prohibited from unloading sharks on private docks.

 

You may be interested

Unemployment and underemployment rates remain high in Costa Rica
Costa Rica
2266 views
Costa Rica
2266 views

Unemployment and underemployment rates remain high in Costa Rica

Alejandro Zúñiga - December 3, 2020

Unemployment in Costa Rica was 21.9% in the August-October quarter, slightly lower than the previous period but still significantly higher than the…

Saprissa, Alajuelense qualify for Champions League
News
1073 views
News
1073 views

Saprissa, Alajuelense qualify for Champions League

The Tico Times - December 3, 2020

Costa Rica's two most-popular soccer clubs will represent the country at the 2021 CONCACAF Champions League. Deportivo Saprissa and Liga…

CCSS conducts ‘mega transfer’ of COVID patients from full hospital
Costa Rica
15816 views
Costa Rica
15816 views

CCSS conducts ‘mega transfer’ of COVID patients from full hospital

Alejandro Zúñiga - December 3, 2020

The Costa Rican Social Security System (CCSS) on Wednesday conducted a large-scale transfer of coronavirus patients from a saturated Escalante Pradilla…